Wednesday, April 10, 2024
REVIEW COLLECTION: Legacy of the “Planet of the Apes” Part 2
Thursday, March 21, 2024
REVIEW COLLECTION: “Ghostbusters” Series
(Courtesy Logo Design Love) |
Monday, March 18, 2024
REVIEW: “Mad Max: Fury Road” (2015)
Mad Max: Fury Road was said to have been one of the most difficult shoots in Hollywood history. Production was delayed several times due to budget concerns, location scouting, logistics, and safety. Filming lasted for over six months in the country of Namibia, with grueling weather conditions that ranged from scorching hot (during the day) to freezing cold (at night). And lead actors Tom Hardy (taking up the mantle this time as the wandering Max Rockatansky) and Charlize Theron (as the fearless and determined Imperator Furiosa) didn’t get along. To make matters worse, executives at Warner Bros. were skeptical—and dismayed—by early test footage.
With that in mind, a better question was if this new Mad Max would actually be any good. As recounted in author Kyle Buchanan’s 2022 book, “Blood, Sweat & Chrome” (an in-depth and eye-opening oral history of the making of the film), Miller described the genesis of his years-in-the-making project this way:
Miller added,
The film is so exhilarating and jaw-dropping that we’re more invested in the story, characters, and genuine stakes, rather than the behind-the-scenes drama. (Hardy and Theron reportedly resolved their differences near the end of production and have since apologized, especially after seeing the finished product.) Still, I don't know what's more amazing: the amount of effort and layers put into the making of this film, or that every single person who worked on it survived. It's a unique and incredible story of tenacity, persistence, integrity, and survival against overwhelming odds. Buchanan, perhaps, summed it up best,
I would argue that Fury Road has more craft and substance than most action movies put together. Many contemporary filmmakers, like Guillermo del Toro and Bong Joon-Ho have declared it as one of the greatest films they’ve ever seen. Executive producer Iain Smith called it “a victory of filmmaking over studio expediency” (read Buchanan's book, pp. 290). Unlike, say, Apocalypse Now (which also had a tremendously difficult production, and a very depressing narrative), Fury Road is a film I could watch again and again, because it’s greater than the sum of its parts. (Which is not to take the otherwise complicated behind-the-scenes stories, nor the film’s violent nature, lightly or passively.) It's also a rare movie of its kind to get the recognition it did at the Academy Awards, maybe the first since The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King the previous decade. (Fury Road won six of its ten nominations, the most awarded to an Australian film to date.) Both were game-changing juggernauts on so many levels. Plus, a black-and-white "chrome" edition of Fury Road (which Miller himself favored more) was released in 2016, with its own unique and dynamic results.
But it’s not a film for everybody, especially the squeamish. Because it's a two-hour chase, the action sequences are relentless, wild, and gonzo. They're the primary reason for the film's R-rating, with a high body count, a few sad deaths, and one particularly graphic moment. The subject matter is heavy, with references to sex slavery (the Five Wives wear revealing garbs for most of the story), human sacrifice (blood is a visual metaphor for life-stealing--hence, the "blood bags"--but also for life-giving), and suicidal fanatics (although, the pale-bodied Nux, played by Nicholas Hoult, does have a redemptive arc).
For everyone else, they may find a lot of mythological and theological elements under the hood. There are themes of environmentalism and some biblical parallels (the aforementioned "Green Place" a.k.a. this story's Garden of Eden). Other themes include feminism, standing against those who abuse power (i.e., political, sexual, physical, spiritual), taking back what was stolen, facing the harsh realities of the world (“Out here, everything hurts”), and looking/fighting for hope and redemption—not just for the central characters, but also for a community or more. Just be sure to strap in.
Monday, March 11, 2024
Oscars 2024: To the Unsung Heroes That Make the Movies
The cast and crew of Oppenheimer accept the award for Best Picture (Courtesy NPR) |
Monday, March 4, 2024
REVIEW COLLECTION: “Mad Max”—The Original Trilogy
(Courtesy Google Search) |
REVIEW COLLECTION: Legacy of the “Planet of the Apes” Part 1
(Courtesy Pixels Merch) |
Friday, March 1, 2024
REVIEW COLLECTION: Six x Seuss
(Courtesy Reddit) |
(Courtesy Columbia Pictures) |
(Courtesy Universal Pictures) |
(Courtesy Universal Pictures/DreamWorks Pictures) |
(Courtesy 20th Century Fox) |
(Courtesy Universal Pictures) |
(Courtesy Universal Pictures) |
Monday, February 12, 2024
REVIEW: “Origin” (2023)
The film dramatizes the original author’s writing process, research, and immersion into the facts and untold stories from the world’s history of dehumanization. Observations and/or accounts from others (including eyewitnesses) create an objective and universal experience. The result is what Ann Hornaday of the Washington Post called “a new cinematic language.”
What is for certain, on the other hand (despite this film’s heavy and difficult subject matter), is what a bold and daring piece of cinema this is. Only two other films from 2023 took such risks: Sony Animation’s Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse and Raven Jackson’s All Dirt Roads Taste of Salt; all three center around black protagonists. (In addition, next to Sound of Freedom, this is the only other 2023 release I saw in theaters with a hashtag over the end credits, encouraging audiences to buy tickets for others to see the film.)
Origin is a profound and eye-opening testament to the power of the written word, as well as perseverance, social change, acknowledging our nation’s (and world’s) history, and recognizing what’s worth living for after all that has happened.