Tuesday, December 28, 2021

Favorite Films of 2021, (c) B.E.


If I had to select only five films from 2021 that I was able to see (and that stuck with me out of all the rest), these would be my picks. 

Zack Snyder's Justice League
Many should agree that the 2017 "theatrical" release of this long-awaited DC Comics team-up event was not the true version. So imagine our excitement when director Zack Snyder revealed that his long-fabled 4-hour cut of JL was actually happening, and how thrilling it was when it was finally released. ZSJL inserts much-needed time with Aquaman Arthur Curry, Flash Barry Allen, and especially Cyborg Victor Stone. Snyder's cinematic trademarks and idiosyncrasies are on full display in an uncompromising expression of creative freedom, despite some graphic, violent imagery at times.
[ ] Another 2021 director's cut worth checking out: Sylvester Stallone's Rocky IV: Rocky vs. Drago

Encanto
Lin-Manuel Miranda has been having a year, from the film version of his 2008 Broadway smash In the Heights, to his directorial debut with the Jonathan Larson biopic tick, tick . . . Boom!; and this bright and lively gem in Disney's animation library. Just as they did with Raya and the Last Dragon earlier this year, the Disney artists take full advantage of onscreen representation and rich world-building, this time with a wonderful and worthwhile story of a Mexican family full of magical gifts, except for the main protagonist (the plucky, bespectacled Maribel). I doubt many families won't even talking about this one for months now. Trust me, you need to see this one. 

Pig
Nicolas Cage gives his best performance in years, as a hermit and former chef on a dark odyssey to find his stolen truffle pig. That premise alone sounds ridiculous on paper, even more so when you consider Cage's general track record in recent years. But whoever thought a film about a runt could be so deep, bleak, and engrossing? Cage's scene in the restaurant, in particular, is a masterclass in acting. An unlikely story of loss and grief, exceptionally made and told. 

Spider-Man: No Way Home
The terms "oversaturation" and "fan-service" (we're looking at you, Ghostbusters: Afterlife) need not apply when this jaw-dropping movie is seen to be believed. Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings was a big surprise (and an entertaining entry) in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, no question. But if movie houses have been struggling for months to bring audiences back to the theaters, then this year-end roller-coaster (and the best of the solo Spidey films in the MCU by far) breaks that curse, reminding us that the (exclusive) moviegoing experience is still alive and well.

C'mon C'mon
Another exceptional indie coming-of-age film about a photojournalist who looks after his young nephew while the boy's mother is away during a family crisis. A profound and raw synchronization of emotions, editing, music, rich performances (led by Joaquin Phoenix, Gaby Hoffman, and newcomer Woody Norman), and bold direction (courtesy Mike Mills, who also wrote the screenplay). A window into the generational relationships between adults and children. 

Other 2021 films I really liked: 
[  ] Kenneth Branagh's Belfast
[  ] John Krasinski's A Quiet Place, Part II
[  ] Marvel Studios' Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings (dir. Destin Daniel Cretton) 
[  ] Steven Spielberg's West Side Story 

REVIEW COLLECTION: 2021 Film Library

(l-r) Noah Jupe, Millicent Simmons, and Emily Blunt in A Quiet Place: Part II

WRITER'S NOTE: The following is a collection of reviews posted on my Instagram account (@be.kerian) throughout the past twelve months. They’ve been organized--and will be posted--by specific categories, in chronological order based on initial (theatrical) release dates, and have been slightly edited. (The dates in which said reviews were initially posted are in parentheses.) 

The following represents the first edition of reviews (alphabetically) I posted on various films released in 2021 that were seen by yours truly at the nearest or convenient movie houses. (However, only two of these titles were not seen in theaters, while two others were thoroughly discussed on this blog in 2021, and have a * symbol after said latter titles.) 

In a year where several feature films finally received a long-awaited theatrical release due to the 2020 pandemic, and where certain streaming services (we're looking at you, HBO Max) faced controversy over simultaneous online and theatrical options, it was nonetheless a slow build back to a centuries-old shared experience that arguably made the term "exclusive" the word of the year. 


Often known for his film adaptations of Shakespeare plays, writer-director Kenneth Branagh helms one of 2021's strongest films, a semi-autobiographical drama about a young boy's upbringing in Ireland in the late 1960s. Shot in beautiful black-and-white (with exceptional, but well-intended, moments of color), I was skeptical that this story would be too similar to 2018's Roma (another B&W masterpiece), considering Belfast's themes of political turmoil, racism, religion, and family. Plus, I ended up going to a showing with on-screen captions, which turned out to be far from distracting (especially for viewers who aren't used to Irish dialects). Peppered with Van Morrison songs over its engrossing soundtrack, and an incredible roster of actors at the top of their game (including screen veterans CiarĂ¡n Hinds and Judi Dench, who are just wonderful to watch), Branagh's film is a story of the places, people and memories that make us, and the opportunities we have to start anew, no matter how challenging. "Go. Go now. Don't look back." (11/14/2021) 


Agent/assassin Natasha Romanoff finally makes her long-awaited solo debut in the Marvel Cinematic Universe--and officially kickstarting a postponed fourth phase in the ever-growing franchise. In a story set between the events of Captain America: Civil War and Avengers: Infinity War, the Black Widow is on the run all while seeking to bring down the very secretive organization that made her who she is. A thoroughly gripping and intense experience (arguably the first of its kind since 2014's Captain America: The Winter Soldier). Some of its humor is a bit out of place, but this was made for the big screen where it belongs. Scarlett Johansson has come a long way, and counting.

(I've got some catching up to do with the Disney+ series The Falcon and the Winter Soldier, Loki, and especially Wandavision.) (7/11/2021) 


The dynamics and complexities between kids and adults (including parents and their children) is brilliantly chronicled in writer-director Mike Mills' engrossing new drama. Joaquin Phoenix plays a radio journalist who travels nationwide asking various kids and teenagers their thoughts about the future, and eventually looks after his young nephew (newcomer Woody Norman) while the boy's mother (Gaby Hoffman) is away during a family crisis.

Shot in beautiful and captivating black-and-white cinematography, and featuring an amazing score, bold editing, and rich and genuine performances (said elements are incredibly synchronized many times throughout), C'mon C'mon is a story of people trying to understand the world around them, how they express themselves uniquely, the effects of absent parental figures, and about finding hope amidst harsh realities. Said realities are not easy, of course. But another underlying theme is that it's okay to not be okay sometimes.

Kudos to the use of various children's books like Frank L. Baum's The Wizard of Oz and Claire A. Nivola's Star Child. This is one of the year's best films, if not the best. (12/5/2021) 

Emma Stone in Cruella

Let's be honest, it's hard to find good, solid, quality film and television that can impact people for the right reasons these days. For those of you who don't ordinarily attend movies or watch television (and your decision not to do so is honorable), here are otherwise some faith-/biblical-based recommendations for you and your family (as well as potential ministry opportunities).

If you've seen and/or are fans of films like Facing the Giants, War Room, and Overcomer, the Kendrick Brothers and Sherwood Pictures (the filmmakers, churches and communities behind those films) recently re-released their 2011 film Courageous for its 10th anniversary (under the title Courageous Legacy), complete with new footage and a new ending. It's powerful message on fatherhood and parenting is profound and worthwhile.

The Kendrick's also made a new documentary touching on similar themes, called Show Me the Father. Speaking of documentaries, Jon & Andrew Erwin (the filmmakers behind 2018's I Can Only Imagine) made a new feature called The Jesus Music, about the contemporary Christian music industry since the mid-20th century. (9/26/2021) 


With the release of this dark origin story centered on one of Disney's greatest villains, I've been asking myself lately what could possibly be the reason behind this film's existence, other than for the Mouse House to continually milk its cash cow of endless live-action remakes of their beloved animated classics. (And 101 Dalmatians is one of my favorite movies, but that's beside the point here.)

Emma Stone (an actress I really like) is terrific as the titular antihero, as is Emma Thompson (still killing it in her 70s) as an equally maniacal fashion designer. And it practically goes without saying that the film's costume design and art direction is impeccable and, dare I say, spot on for its 1970s punk-rock London setting.

That being said, Cruella seems to follow a similar route that Todd Phillips took with 2019's Joker (albeit the graphic violence, profanity, and smoking), in asking audiences to not only understand its tragic and troubling lead character, but also to sympathize with her during her many menacing schemes. Disney is no stranger to dark content, but this film left me polarized and, as I've said, curious about its existence. It certainly isn't a film for children, I can say that as well. (5/30/2021) 


I'm often reminded of how movies can inspire us and bring out the best in us. Disney's latest animated adventure--their 60th, in fact--did that for me. An original story about a Mexican family and a magical home, Encanto is thoroughly colorful, lively, and full of heart. It stalls a bit in its second half, but its strong narrative and emphasis on a unique cast of characters (not to mention an infectious soundtrack, with original songs by the multi-talented Lin-Manuel Miranda) sneak up on you. This is a story of community, family, and being real and embracing yourself, flaws and all. In one word, Encanto is magical. (11/24/2021) 


One thing that's for certain about Marvel Studios, fan or not: they never lack ambition. Even after two monumental Avengers finales and now four phases into their already-unprecedented cinematic universe, Eternals represents one of their most daring and challenging films. Based on Jack Kirby's celebrated comic book series of extra-terrestrial beings who have been on Earth for thousands of years, there's a lot to like about this epic story, as much as there is to be confused by (especially if your not familiar with the history of the series or characters).

First the good news: the film looks and sounds stunning (especially in IMAX, despite its distracting aspect ratio shifts). The cast is stellar--further proof of Hollywood's significant shift in onscreen and cultural representation, not to mention universal appeal. And the fact that it was shot at real worldwide locations (my hats of to director Chloe Zhao and crew) adds to its authenticity and rich world-building.

Even so, said world-building and mythology can be hard to follow, considering the story jumps between various time periods in which our central characters have lived through. It can also get very meandering and too introspective. At more than two-and-a-half hours, Eternals (much like another Disney-produced feature this year, Cruella) feels longer than it needs to be--even more than Zack Snyder's Justice League, and that one was just over four hours in length!

As I said, Marvel Studios never lacks ambition. Only time will tell how this world within their cinematic universe will thrive or shake from here. (11/7/2021) 

Godzilla vs. Kong

It's been a long time--months, actually--since I've seen a movie at Marcus Theatres . And what better way to revisit than with the latest continuation of a popular 80s franchise? Director Jason Reitman takes the reigns started by his father Ivan in 1984, when Bill Murray, Dan Ackroyd, Harold Ramis, and Ernie Hudson first sported jumpsuits and proton packs while catching various specters around New York City.

Now, more than 35 years later, a struggling family inherits an old farmhouse and discovers a mysterious connection to one of the original members. To say more would only be spoiling the excitement and thrills of this nostalgic and fresh roller-coaster of a movie. I will say this: while it has dark spiritual elements (more than the original film did, honestly), some genuine jump scares, and a few familiar plot points that get cleverly subverted (they are a disappointment, to say the least; but still, you may be surprised by some unexpected appearances), this is the best time I've had at the movies in a long while. (In a moviegoing sense, of course.)

Extra fun: It helps that the cast is terrific, especially McKenna Grace, Finn Wolfhard, and Paul Rudd. The same goes for a booming surround sound, and a great balance of practical and digital effects. One of the best movie lines of 2021: "It has a gunner's seat?" (11/21/2021) 


Warner Bros & Legendary Pictures continue their "Monster-Verse" with this fourth installment in the larger-than-life franchise (following 2014's surprisingly-good Godzilla, 2017's entertaining Kong: Skull Island, and 2019's lackluster Godzilla: King of the Monsters), pitting the two most popular cinematic creatures of all time against each other. The good news: the movie delivers the goods on a visual front, with insane, slam-bang action and destruction as can be expected.

But here's the thing--well, two things, actually. 1) what you see in the trailers is exactly what you get, and then some cranked up to eleven. And 2) my biggest qualm with what started out as a promising cinematic universe is that everything rushes so fast that we hardly have time to breath and absorb it all, let alone get emotionally invested in its plot (which is so convoluted and ridiculous, we could care less anyway) and characters (although a few players standout, like Brian Tyree Henry, Millie Bobby Brown, and deaf child actress Kaylee Hottle; and Kong himself, arguably the real star here). So not only does it lack restraint, but also genuine suspense and thrills. Perhaps this franchise should look again at their first chapter from 2014. Just a suggestion. (4/4/2021) 


I think we, as moviegoers, might be taking for granted how much of a comeback movie musicals have been making over the past decade. Aside from the obvious Disney animation (we're looking at you, Frozen and Moana), several other live-action originals and adaptations have been making waves, from Damien Chazelle's La La Land to Michael Gracey's The Greatest Showman, and Steven Spielberg's version of West Side Story this fall. Fans of Lin-Manuel Miranda's Hamilton will undoubtedly be taken with the cinematic version of his impressive and immersive stage debut from 2008, courtesy Crazy Rich Asians director Jon M. Chu. A burst of cultural representation and celebration, In the Heights is set in the NYC neighborhood of Washington Heights, as the story follows various characters with their own dreams, aspirations, setbacks, and perseverance; narrated by lead character Usnavi (a breakout Anthony Ramos). Several suggestive elements will be the major drawback for more discerning families in what is otherwise an energetic and inspirational experience. (6/15/2021) 


A hermit (and former chef) goes on a dark quest to find his stolen truffle pig. Sounds as ridiculous a premise as it is, but considering that Nicolas Cage is the headliner of this indie drama--what with his bizarre track record in film, as most of us know--one would think that's a recipe for disaster. Well, think and look again. Pig (written and directed by Michael Sarnoski) is not only one of 2021's most striking films, but also one of the most subversive that has ever been made or seen. A very atmospheric, meditative, and haunting character study about loss and grief, Cage (very subdued, quiet, esoteric, and battered throughout) gives agreeably his best performance in years. Whoever thought a story about a pig would be so deep, bleak, and multilayered? (12/17/2021) 


If ever there was a film franchise that strangely (though unintentionally) paralleled the 2020 pandemic, this may be the closest thing. This anticipated follow-up to the surprise 2018 horror feature rises to the task of being just as immersive and hair-raising, thanks in part to returning players Emily Blunt, Millicent Simmonds and Noah Jupe (with equally impressive new additions like Cillian Murphy, playing against type, and Djimon Hounsou), as well as writer-director John Krasinski. Even if it comes with a few flaws and shortcomings (of which there are only a few), A Quiet Place: Part II is overall an edge-of-your-seat experience that demands to be seen on the big screen. Just don't make a lot of noise if you see it. (5/30/2021) 

Raya and the Last Dragon

The latest from Walt Disney Animation Studios is one of the year's first standout features. In the tradition of diverse classics as Mulan, Pocahontas, and Moana, Raya and the Last Dragon pushes the boundaries of on-screen representation, this time immersing in Southeast Asian culture and folklore, with a story that follows the titular warrior on a quest to find and assemble pieces of an ancient gem to restore a broken and divided world, with help from a magical (and wisecracking) dragon. Although it does seem a little fast-paced (my only qualm), the film more than benefits from multi-dimensional characters (with terrific vocal efforts from Kelly Marie Tran and Awkwafina as the eponymous leads, respectfully), colorful art direction and production design, and themes that couldn't be more timely. Another amazing and spectacular achievement from Disney.

Extra fun: the preceding short film, Us Again, a charming and delightful music-and-dance tale about an aging, interracial couple. Also worth noting: this film, combined with trailers for Warner Bros. In the Heights and Pixar's Luca renewed my belief in the power of movies, and cinema in general. (3/7/2021) 

 
During the 2020 worldwide COVID-19 pandemic (and while on hiatus from another film), Stallone decided to do a re-cut of 1985's Rocky IV, retitled Rocky vs Drago: The Ultimate Director's Cut. When asked during a live Q&A presentation with Turner Classic Movies host Ben Mankewicz in November as to why he chose to re-edit this particular sequel, Stallone admitted it was the most "flawed" in the series. Despite being the highest-grossing chapter and making a breakout star out of Dolph Lundgren, the actor-filmmaker wanted to re-assemble the film "in a contemporary fashion that is more soulful and dramatic," and with more humanity. 

If 2018's Creed II brought the Rocky-Creed saga full circle, then this alternate version of Rocky IV adds depth, new meaning, and much-better closure (pre-Rocky Balboa) to the original series, as well as more time with its central characters, much like Richard Donner's 2006 cut of 1981's Superman II brought that original franchise to a more worthwhile conclusion. 

With a new beginning and a clearer emphasis on Drago being exploited by the Soviet Union, this version also makes the action and brawling between the two opponents much less superhuman. The fight sequences are more gripping and grounded, with sound effects toned down; ditto the iconic training montage, a strong David-&-Goliath illustration of nature vs. technology, past vs. future (seriously, that dragonfly bit is impressive). The lighting has been adjusted and is now more bold, instead of foggy like before. Even the aspect ratio has been changed (or compressed?), from a 1.85:1 to a 2.39:1 format. 

More importantly, the film emphasizes its themes of age and pride in a way the theatrical cut never did, highlighting what is truly at stake for these characters. The theatrical cut, Stallone agrees, was superficial, fast-paced, and had less time to breath. (The robot/Paulie subplot, lest we forget, was one thing that Stallone knew he had to axe.) Even so, other sequences, like the James Brown performance in Las Vegas, don't feel out of place with these new adjustments. If anything, Rocky vs. Drago represents an opportunity for a star/filmmaker to present an alternative or corrected history. (12/28/2021


I've got to be honest, I had low expectations for this martial-arts action-adventure--the second installment in Phase Four of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. But I was quite blown away by how good it was.

Sure, Shang-Chi has dynamic and genuine action sequences (despite the fact that half of it is clearly CGI), a killer score, slick direction (courtesy indie filmmaker Destin Daniel Cretton, of Short Term 12 and Just Mercy), and an awesome cast (mostly Asian and Asian-American actors, including the legendary Michelle Yeoh). But it has a strong, beating heart in its central story of the son of a centuries-old assassin and the complicated family dynamics, misguided use of power, and past mistakes he has to face and ultimately make right. The film does lose a bit of momentum in its second act, and some of the dialogue (unnecessarily crass at times) could've easily been avoided; it even gets surprisingly dark with its elements of mysticism and spirituality.

Overall, this is an exciting (if occasionally benign) blockbuster that goes in unexpected directions, showcasing, in the process, how to take what we've learned from those before us and making it our own. Wow. This is one of the biggest surprises of 2021. It'll be mindblowing to see how the MCU continues this trend with Spider-Man: No Way Home in December and Doctor Strange and the Multiverse of Madness next year. (9/5/2021) 


It's been almost two decades since we last saw Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck, and the whole Looney Tunes gang on the big screen, and 25 years since they first played the court with Michael Jordan against the Monstars in the 1996 hit crowdpleaser Space Jam. Only this time, instead of the ever-popular Warner Bros characters recruiting an NBA superstar, it's the basketball phenomenon (this time, LeBron James) who recruits the Tunes to help save his son in a digital, do-or-die ball game.

So far, this movie's been getting mixed reviews from critics, which may not be that surprising. (Like I said, this is a crowdpleasing franchise.) Some may quip, though, about the CGI renderings of Bugs and company in the film's ultimate showdown, not to mention the various (some not-really-kid-friendly, WB properties that make cameo appearances, from Mad Max to The Matrix to Game of Thrones, and even A Clockwork Orange--WHAT?). But it's absolute fun seeing the Looney Tunes in their classic 2D forms (kudos to the thousands of artists involved).

With that in mind, this long-awaited sequel actually improves on the original, in terms of its consistent tone, more personal stakes, and a general respect for each character's classic traits and trademarks (despite a martini-drinking Granny and freestyle-rapping Porky Pig). Plus, the millions of cameos within the "WB Server-Verse" (and an extra surprise appearance!) alone are worth repeated viewings, giving "Ready Player One" a run for its money. What it could of used was more restraint and less IP-promoting. That's all for now, folks. (7/18/2021) 

Lebron James and Bugs Bunny in Space Jam: A New Legacy

DON'T WORRY, NO SPOILERS HERE. NOT REALLY. 

I mentioned in one of my previous Spider-Man reviews the term "oversaturation," which makes sense in this day and age of multiple franchises and studio tentpoles. In my review for last month's Ghostbusters: Afterlife, I didn't bring up the term "fan-service," which makes more sense when analyzing that sequel in retrospect. 

Both of those terms could easily apply to the MCU's third solo Spider-Man movie starring Tom Holland. At least on the service. If you've been paying attention to the trailers and marketing, you know by now there would be appearances by former foes like Alfred Molina's Doc Ock and Willem Dafoe's Green Goblin. But No Way Home is way more than that. In fact, it's better.

Not only does it subvert all expectations out of proportion--and you're in for a whole load of surprises! This is a powerful story of second chances and making the right choices, no matter how difficult. And it's not only the best solo Spidey entry in the MCU (honestly, they've been doing an incredible job overall with these installments, and third time really is the charm here), but arguably the best moviegoing experience since Avengers: Endgame in 2019. Trust me, this one is worth going to the theaters for. My only warning: prepare to be wowed!

And one more thing I'd like to mention: much like Jared Leto got to revisit (and reimagine) his version of the Joker in Zack Snyder's Justice League, so here does Jamie Foxx get to revisit his rendition of Electro from 2014's The Amazing Spider-Man 2. I did mention second chances, didn't I? (12/20/2021) 


The best thing I can say about this latest incarnation of obscure supervillains in the DC Universe is that it's a lot better than the disappointing mess we got in 2016. But that is far from a recommendation. Sure, this action-comedy is colorful and features a stellar cast (especially Daniela Melchoir's Ratcatcher 2 and Sylvester Stallone's King Shark), as well as writer-director James Gunn (of Marvel's Guardians of the Galaxy fame)'s trademark wit and offbeat humor--even though the film does drag on at times. But you should know this is very-hard-R territory, with characters spewing out numerous profanities and graphic violence (exploding heads, slashed limbs, etc.), giving Deadpool some heavy competition. Gunn has dabbled in such content before, having penned Zack Snyder's 2004 remake of Dawn of the Dead, and directed other gorefests like 2006's Slither and 2010's Super. Also, the marketing may have been misleading in more ways than one. Just saying. (8/22/2021) 


Audiences today may not recognize the ever-popular cat-and-mouse duo Tom & Jerry (made famous from nearly eighty years of animated shorts and specials by Hanna-Barbara and Chuck Jones). Longtime fans, on the other hand, will recall fond memories of the duo's hilarious hijinks. But this newest live-action/animated comedy is only their second theatrical feature-length outing.

Their first movie hit the big screen in 1993, in an adventure that started out promising enough, only to become a missed opportunity doomed to fail. You see, our favorite frenemies "talk" in this "musical," which many animation fans and historians consider sacrilege for such characters known for their pantomime escapades. To add insult to injury, the duo were thrown into (and upstaged by) a generic and lazy plot involving a runaway orphan and some seriously creepy adult figures. Honestly, these are some of the greatest cartoon characters of all time, and they deserved better material than this--despite Henri Mancini's delightful theme music and a clever blink-and-you'll-miss-it cameo from Droopy Dog.

I bring this up because Warner Animation Group seems to have learned this lesson with their 2021 movie. Admittedly, it's not prestigious or top-notch, as far as its average and underdeveloped live-action story goes (ditto its hip-hop soundtrack and vibe, which may be a little too much for some viewers). But its retro 2D-style animation alone is a delight, retaining the classic traits that made these characters enduring in the first place. Plus, its NYC hotel setting is worthy of their talents. If anything, it's a significant improvement from the 1993 movie three decades prior. (3/2/2021) 


A well-made, gripping fantasy-drama in the same cinematic realm as A Monster Calls and I Kill Giants (of which this film's distributor, RLJE Films, made a few years ago). This story follows a young boy (Lonnie Chavis a.k.a. Young Randall Pearson from This Is Us) as he searches for a mysterious figure whom he believes may help his ailing mother. David Oyelowo (Martin Luther King from Selma) works in front of and behind the camera, along with a terrific supporting cast (including Rosario Dawson, Alfred Molina, and Maria Bello). Exceptional 2D graphic novel effects are one of this film's many highlights. (5/9/2021) 

Ansel Elgort and Rachel Zegler in West Side Story

One of several films this year delayed due to the 2020 pandemic, Steven Spielberg's more-culturally-relevant-yet-old-fashioned update of the acclaimed and celebrated 1950s musical West Side Story finally hits the big screen. Already creating positive buzz, it's easy to see why. 

To be sure, there are some flaws in characterizations and a few contrived plot points. (Apparently, Ansel Elgort has been getting some criticisms for his portrayal of leading man Tony, but honestly, he's not bad.) Plus, the story's themes of racism, xenophobia, immigration, and the tragic side of the American Dream are handled more realistically (and more intense) than the 1961 film adaptation before it. 

On the other hand, its overall production values--from Janusz Kaminski's immersive cinematography, to Justin Peck's choreography (originated on stage and screen by Jerome Robbins), Tony Kushner's adapted screenwriting, Leonard Bernstein's engrossing score, the now-late Stephen Sondheim's brilliant songs, the daring lack of subtitles, and Spielberg's skilled direction (the man hasn't lost his cinematic touch)--make up for said flaws. 

Arguably, the real stars are the many standout performances, particularly Rachel Zegler (as Maria), the legendary Rita Morena (as new character Valentina), and especially Ariana DeBose (succeeding Moreno as Anita--give this woman an Oscar already!). In addition, the way this adaptation subverts the context of its memorable songs may leave you breathless; pay close attention, for example, to "America" and "Somewhere". (12/12/2021) 


Watching the appropriately-named Zack Snyder’s Justice League [back in March], I marveled (so to speak) at the never-before-seen footage of its titular characters and their respective arcs, including citizens of Aquaman/Arthur Curry’s underwater kingdom of Atlantis; Wonder Woman/Diana Prince’s fearless island of Themyscira; and a deeper backstory of the defenders of Earth, the “Mother Boxes,” and a much more intimidating Steppenwolf along with the big bad Darkseid. There’s even a completely revamped take on Jared Leto’s previously-criticized interpretation of the Joker (from 2016’s Suicide Squad) in one of the film’s central moments (four minutes of new footage, shot in 2020, expanding the 'Knightmare' sequence from BvS). The film really takes its time and adds weight and ethereal emotion, and gives each character their moment(s) to shine, individually and collectively. Whereas [Joss] Whedon’s [theatrical] version was conventional and studio-driven, Synder’s version is much more genuine. (And yes, the whole mustache fiasco is out, while black suit Superman is in.) It really shows. It’s also fulfilling, in many ways, to see what was promised in initial teaser trailers released in 2016 and 2017, respectively. Talk about a long time coming. (4/6/2021

WRITER'S CUT: One Step, One Punch, One Round at a Time: The Legacy of Sylvester Stallone, From "Rocky" to "Creed"


"WRITER'S CUT": A collection of previously-published posts that have been thoroughly re-examined and re-edited by yours truly. (The following was originally published on November 1, 2018.) 

***
In the early-1970s, a young actor was struggling to make it into the movie business. He was constantly being rejected by producers and agents who never believed he would be a movie star, due to the way he looked and the way he talked (when he was born, he suffered a paralysis in his lower lip, resulting in a permanent snarl and speech impediment). He was also struggling to make ends meet and, according to one resource, had only $106 in his bank account. 

Inspired by the poems and life of Edgar Allen Poe, as well as the idea of unfulfilled dreams, he turned to writing for escapism and inspiration. Then, one night, after watching a televised boxing match between Muhammad Ali and Chuck Wepner, he had an idea: a story about a lowlife boxer from Philadelphia who is given a one-in-a-million shot at the heavyweight title. A story about redemption, self-respect, love, courage, and going the distance.


"I Can't Sing or Dance"
Released in December of 1976, Rocky is the quintessential underdog story--certainly as far as fictional films go. What makes it even more compelling is the reality behind Stallone's life up to that point, including his persistence and dedication in writing it, and his insistence on playing the lead role. In many ways, it's a semi-autobiographical journey, something the other films (from 1979 to 2006) would subsequently do.

Rocky could easily be described a sports or boxing movie, but it really isn't. The heart of the film lies in its character drama and universal story. In terms of characters, there's the titular "Italian Stallion," a street-smart fighter with a trademark fedora and jacket, who makes a living by working the books for a loan shark. There's Adrian (Talia Shire), the painfully shy pet shop worker he falls for. There's her brother Paulie (Burt Young), a meat factory worker constantly begging for other job opportunities, and Rocky's closest friend. There's Mickey (Burgess Meredith), the trainer who at first seems very arrogant and mean-spirited, but who deep down believes in Rocky, so much that he's willing to be brutally honest with him. And finally, there's Apollo Creed (Carl Weathers), the prized Muhammad Ali-type fighter who gives Rocky a shot at the heavyweight championship. All are fully-realized and represent the kind of people they don't make movies about a whole lot these days. 

Sylvester Stallone and Talia Shire in Rocky

The film's screenplay represents a great three-act structure. For starters, the story really takes its time in setting up its characters, who they are, and what their dilemmas and desires are (i.e., Rocky's low point in society, Adrian's shell she apparently can't escape, Paulie's lack of career opportunities, and even Apollo's flaws he tries to cover up). The central conflict that follows thematically pits two ends of society against each other, complete with various forms of physical, relational and emotional conflict brewing between them. And, of course, there's the resolution with the climatic match.

Films certainly have a long history of "happy accidents" that have become iconic moments over the years. And this low-budget film (made from about $1.2 million) is no exception. From the lack of extras in the ice-skating rink during Rocky and Adrian's first date, to Shire being sick with the flu during her love scene with Stallone, the fight poster's misplaced colors, and Rocky's baggy fighting robe. These scenes could've been cheap because of the film's low-budget. And yet, they work because the actors made the most of them.

Of course, we can't talk about Rocky without mentioning the ever-popular training montage, complete with running, meat punching, and soaring to the top of the Philadelphia steps (which, reportedly, is the second most-toured landmark in the city of Philadelphia, after the Liberty Bell), and at the height of Bill Conti's unforgettable score (one of the greatest of all-time).

As is common with sports-related films (let alone, true stories), it's easy to hope that the main protagonist will win because that's the conventional nature of the story. Rocky was made and released during the mid-1970s, a time when various antiheroes dominated the cinema, from mafia boss Michael Corleane in The Godfather to Travis Brickell in Taxi Driver. Stallone was reportedly inspired by films like Martin Scorsese's Mean Streets, Delbert Mann's Marty, and Elia Kazan's On the Waterfront when writing the screenplay. (You can even see traces of Marlon Brando's Terry Malloy from the latter film in Stallone's performance.) If you don't believe Stallone has range as an actor, you haven't seen this film. He's tough. Charismatic. Charming. Sensitive. Sympathetic. Even raw.

What made Rocky himself an inspiration was his integrity and perseverance against all odds. He even admits (in a scene that may just be the best showcase of Stallone's acting career) he can't win the fight. On the other hand, he believes if he can still stand after ten brutal rounds (the most he's ever endured up to that point), then it will all be worth it. And therein lies the moment of truth for Rocky, in the form of "going the distance". In other words, the important thing for Rocky (and all the other Rocky's in the world) is not merely winning. The important thing is sticking it out; but from that, it's a win for one's integrity. Or as he says, "If I can go that distance . . . I'll know, for the first time in my life, that I weren't just another bum from the neighborhood."

Sylvester Stallone (right) in Rocky III

"You Got Civilized."
Stallone's career from thereon became a series of hit-or-misses, as well as some heavy career lows. However, in the midst of these various projects (including another franchise he helped popularize, adapted from David Morrell's novels about Vietnam war veteran John Rambo), he kept coming back to Rocky every few years, incorporating aforementioned semi-autobiographical elements related to his growing fame as a movie star and status as a machismo icon. 

While these sequels were mostly crowd-pleasing stories (with over-the-top fighting and occasionally sappy dialogue), they still came with their share of signature elements. For one thing, there were the diverse opponents, including the obnoxious Clubber Lang (future A-Team member Mr. T) in 1982's Rocky III, and Soviet machine Ivan Drago (future action star Dolph Lundgren) in 1985's Rocky IV. There was also the surprising character arc of Apollo Creed, a rivalry-turned-friendship that Rocky began to value and soon avenged. And who could forget Survivor's empowering anthem, "Eye of the Tiger," in the third film, or the gripping training montage of distinct workout methods in the fourth chapter? Bill Conti's underappreciated score for 1979's Rocky II also deserves another look. 

Things came to a supposed (and disappointing) end with the release of Rocky V in 1990. The follow-up found Rocky broken down and brain-damaged from his match with Ivan Drago, stripped of his riches and forced to move his family back into his old neighborhood (one of the few worthy story choices here), and seeking to train a new up-and-coming fighter (Tommy Morrison), who eventually gets led astray by money, fame and pride, all while Rocky puts his family aside. There's even a street fight instead of a boxing match, which Stallone admits was a dark turn instead of a hopeful one. 

The overall effect of the film (besides its critical and commercial failure) took a toll on Stallone, who admitted he made the film out of greed. After that, he continued starring in various hit-or-miss films, including the much-maligned 1992 action-comedy Stop! Or My Mom Will Shoot, 1993's mountain-climbing thriller Cliffhanger, 1997's underground-tunnel epic Daylight (which co-starred his real-life son Sage Stallone, who also played his son in Rocky V), and 1997's critically-acclaimed police-drama Copland. For the latter, he packed on 50 pounds to play an overweight sheriff of a small New Jersey town led by crooked cops.

Personally, Stallone had gone through two failed marriages and two sons. Then, in 1997, he wed actress Jennifer Flavin and had three daughters, all of whom were named "Ms. Golden Globe" in 2017. On his marriage to Flavin, Stallone stated, "It's been a fantastic revival of my life. As you know, my first marriage didn't go so well, though I have a relationship with my sons, but this marriage has been a second beginning. I used to think my career was number one, so I was gone nine months out of a year, but I learned the hard way that the most important thing is that you start at home and then comes the career." At the Golden Globe Awards in 2016, he thanked his family by saying that "having [their] love is the greatest award in the world, every day."

Sylvester Stallone in Rocky Balboa

In 2006, Stallone was initially the laughing stock of the film industry when he announced he was writing, directing, and starring in a sixth Rocky film, titled Rocky Balboa. Not surprisingly, many believed it would be just another pointless, cash-grab sequel. But when it was released in December that year, it proved critics and general audiences wrong. 

Instead of a mere fight film, Rocky Balboa recalled the emotional complexities of the 1976 original by portraying an aging fighter in a world that has passed him by, where he has lost loved ones, and who fights an inner "beast" apparently out of life's difficulties and unpredictabilities. And yet, Rocky still tries to maintain what he does have (i.e., his friend Paulie, his son Robert), and prove that his life (and life in general) is still worth living. As Rocky says, "It ain't about how hard you hit. It's about how hard you can get hit, and keep moving forward. How much you can take, and keep moving forward. That's how winning is done."

The film marked a proper end to the series and the birth of a renaissance era for Stallone, who (in his 60s at the time) didn't let his age discourage him. As an actor, writer, producer, and director, he headlined a fourth Rambo film (2008's curiously-titled Rambo), as well as the 2010 surprise hit, The Expendables, an ultra-violent mashup of 1980s action stars and explosive mayhem.

"I Got Other Plans For My Life, and This Wasn't Part of It."
Then, when audiences and critics (let alone, Stallone) least expected it, a young up-and-coming filmmaker from Oakland had a deeply personal idea for reviving the Rocky franchise: a spinoff centered on the illegitimate son of the late Apollo Creed, and his tutelage from the Italian Stallion himself. Director Ryan Coogler first connected with the original series through the sheer passion of his athletic father, who was a huge fan. When Coogler was completing film school at USC, his father had fallen gravely ill. As a personal favor, the young filmmaker then knew the kind of film he wanted to make.

After Stallone refused Coogler's initial concept (which included an aging and ailing Rocky), the young filmmaker's directorial debut (2013's Sundance-winning drama Fruitvale Station) was released. It impressed Stallone and co-producer Irvin Winkler, but Stallone was even more enamored by Coogler's willpower and determination, which reminded Stallone of his own tenacity when writing and starring in the 1976 original. Therefore, 2015's Creed represented a passing of the baton from one generation to the next, as the story centered on a young man with fighting in his blood, who sets out to prove to himself and to others that his existence isn't for nothing, as well as learn that a name alone does not define one's legacy.

Coogler added a gritty realism and original voice that had never been seen or heard in the series before. The fighting, for one thing, has never been more realistic or intense. One scene, in particular, shows two full boxing rounds in one impressive take. The character of Adonis (played by Michael B. Jordan), like Rocky and Apollo, sees Rocky as a surrogate father-figure, even while fighting or going through feelings of abandonment. In short, Creed is a story of father-son dynamics, hard work, forgiveness, and fighting together. This is also the first time Rocky has played a supporting role. And yet, Stallone has never been more vulnerable or believable with this character (or in any other role for that matter). He deservedly received various accolades for his performance. 

Sylvester Stallone and Michael B. Jordan in Creed

Adonis's story continued in 2018's Creed II, with Stallone and Jordan returning, along with Tessa Thompson (as love-interest Bianca). Coogler stepped down as director to work on Marvel's Black Panther (a blockbuster juggernaut when released in February that year), but stayed on as co-producer; directing duties went to first-time feature-filmmaker Steven Caple, Jr.. For the story (co-written by Stallone), Adonis would go up against the son of Ivan Drago, who infamously "beat" Apollo Creed in 1985's Rocky IV. Dolph Lundgren even returned as an older, more brooding Ivan Drago. 

Initially, Creed II could've gone one of two ways. In one corner, it could've been just another cash-cow installment centered on a brutal grudge match, filled with nostalgia from the 1980s. In the other corner, there was a more grounded approach, one with some unexpected character development and depth, not to mention a continuation (and, in some respects, a rewritten history) of a previous entry considered by many to be over-the-top and controversial. 

When released in November of 2018, the finished film proved to be more of the latter. It didn't quite reach the same cinematic and storytelling heights as its predecessor. Some may even accuse it of being predictable, not surprising, considering the critical reception many of the original films gained. But Creed II's unexpectedly-deep human drama and poetic narrative is anything but. Lundgren, for one, really humanizes Drago in a way that he never got to in Rocky IV. The film really packs a punch in more ways than usual.

At the time, Stallone posted on social media that this would be his final on-screen portrayal of Rocky Balboa, with Jordan, Thompson, and Coogler continuing the series with the upcoming Creed III in 2022. In the mean time, Stallone continues to prove he's more than just a movie star or action hero. He is an artist, a poet, and a devoted family man. Whatever you think of him, you can't deny he is a dedicated and hard-working man, and a force to be reckoned with. As Rocky would say, "Ain't nothin' over still it's over."

Promotional material for Rocky IV: Rocky vs. Drago

POSTSCRIPT: "He's Not a Machine! He's a Man!" 
During the 2020 worldwide COVID-19 pandemic (and while on hiatus from another film), Stallone decided to do a re-cut of 1985's Rocky IV, retitled Rocky vs Drago: The Ultimate Director's Cut. When asked during a live Q&A presentation with Turner Classic Movies host Ben Mankewicz in November as to why he chose to re-edit this particular sequel, Stallone admitted it was the most "flawed" in the series. Despite being the highest-grossing chapter and making a breakout star out of Dolph Lundgren, the actor-filmmaker wanted to re-assemble the film "in a contemporary fashion that is more soulful and dramatic," and with more humanity. 

If 2018's Creed II brought the Rocky-Creed saga full circle, then this alternate version of Rocky IV adds depth, new meaning, and much-better closure (pre-Rocky Balboa) to the original series, as well as more time with its central characters, much like Richard Donner's 2006 cut of 1981's Superman II brought that original franchise to a more worthwhile conclusion. 

With a new beginning and a clearer emphasis on Drago being exploited by the Soviet Union, this version also makes the action and brawling between the two opponents much less superhuman. The fight sequences are more gripping and grounded, with sound effects toned down; ditto the iconic training montage, a strong David-&-Goliath illustration of nature vs. technology, past vs. future (seriously, that dragonfly bit is impressive). The lighting has been adjusted and is now more bold, instead of foggy like before. Even the aspect ratio has been changed (or compressed?), from a 1.85:1 to a 2.39:1 format. 

More importantly, the film emphasizes its themes of age and pride in a way the theatrical cut never did, highlighting what is truly at stake for these characters. The theatrical cut, Stallone agrees, was superficial, fast-paced, and had less time to breath. (The robot/Paulie subplot, lest we forget, was one thing that Stallone knew he had to axe.) Even so, other sequences, like the James Brown performance in Las Vegas, don't feel out of place with these new adjustments. If anything, Rocky vs. Drago represents an opportunity for a star/filmmaker to present an alternative or corrected history. 

Monday, December 6, 2021

REVIEW COLLECTION: Spider-Man


WRITER'S NOTE: The following is a collection of reviews posted on my Instagram account (@be.kerian) throughout the past twelve months. They’ve been organized--and will be posted--by specific categories, in chronological order based on initial (theatrical) release dates, and have been slightly edited. (The dates in which said reviews were initially posted are in parentheses.) 

With Spider-Man: No Way Home opening exclusively in movie theaters next week, let's look back at the many cinematic variations of our favorite Marvel wall-crawler from the last two decades. Only solo films will be mentioned (live-action and animated), so no appearances in the Marvel Cinematic Universe or otherwise will be included. 

*** 
Spider-Man (2002)
By the turn of the century, the superhero genre was a scarce one at best and a divisive one at worst. For every initially-successful franchise like Superman and Batman, there were many others that were middling or poor (The Quest for Peace or Batman & Robin, anybody?). Then Marvel's X-Men made their big-screen debut in 2000 (courtesy Bryan Singer), followed soon after by horror veteran Sam Raimi's live-action take on Stan Lee & Steve Ditko's ever-popular webslinger and his mild-mannered alter-ego.

Sure, the special effects and visual aesthetic are cheesy, dizzying, and flawed by today's standards. Even Willem Dafoe's iconic Green Goblin resembles a ridiculous Power Rangers foe; the actor's complex take on tragic scientist Norman Osborn fairs much better. But the engrossing coming-of-age story involving Peter Parker (a likeable Tobey Maguire), his secret love for girl-next-door Mary Jane Watson (Kirsten Dunst), and his growth and responsibility with his newfound superpowers, is what really carries the film. That, and an exciting sense of high-flying vertigo (seriously, that closing shot!).

TRIVIAL FACT #1: Before the tragic events of 9/11, early marketing (including a teaser trailer in the summer of 2001) featured the Twin Towers reflected in Spidey's eyes. Part of the film's subsequent success (along with the character's selfless acts of heroism) couldn't have been more timely and inspiring with critics and audiences.

TRIVIAL FACT #2: If you want to listen to a great parody, check out Weird Al Yankovich's "Ode to a Superhero". (9/5/2021) 

"Superheroes aren't supposed to have problems. Why would they? They can do anything." At least that's what conventional wisdom said up until about two decades ago. Enter Peter Parker.

In this follow-up to Sam Raimi's box-office smash from 2002, Parker not only struggles with balancing a "normal" life with his role as the ever-popular webslinger. His friendships and close relationships are on the rocks, including friend Harry Osborn (who has vowed revenge against the man he blames for his father's death), secret love Mary Jane Watson (who's begun to lose faith and trust in him), and his widowed Aunt May (what with his own guilt over his Uncle Ben's death). Even more, he wrestles with fear over potentially losing said loved ones, and whether he should even continue in his self-chosen responsibility as a "hero".

Because this installment relies more on character developments, internal conflicts, and emotional depth (kudos to Raimi, as well as screenwriters Alfred Gough, Miles Millar, Michael Chabon, and Alvin Sargent) over action and special effects (spectacular and incredible as they are, especially with that visceral "Spider-Cam" cinematography and the now-unforgettable train sequence), this is a rare sequel that really improves on its predecessor in every way. Add in a fantastic villain in the form of Alfred Molina's Doc Ock (one of the greatest examples of a sympathetic adversary), and you have not only one of the best (and darkest) interpretations of Spider-Man, but one of the greatest (if not the greatest) superhero movies ever made. "Ladies and gentlemen, fasten your seat belts." (9/6/2021) 

The potential was there. Teaser trailers for Sam Raimi's third Spider-Man film hinted at a darker chapter, borrowing heavily from the "Alien Symbiote" storyline from the comics (one of the most famous in the character's history), as Peter Parker succumbs to his bad side, romances Gwen Stacy, and faces off against his friend-turned-rival Harry Osborn (along with the Sandman and potentially Venom). The black suit was a plus. The inclusion of John Jameson (who, in the comics, journeys to space and inadvertently brings back the substance) in the last movie even showed such promise.

But alas, Hollywood has a long history of film franchises running out of steam, and the result in this case was one of the biggest letdowns in superhero cinema. Granted, Spider-Man 3 had a lot going for it. It had colorful characters (particularly Thomas Haden Church's Flint Marko), at least two or three terrific action sequences, and some worthwhile themes. What it didn't have was the sincerity and risk-taking from the previous films (especially Part II); even the aforementioned symbiote plot (which worked far better in the animated series from the 1990s, though the film did have some good homages) lacked any real depth and meaning. What we got instead was poor dialogue, cardboard characterizations (with the possible exception of J. Jonah Jameson and Marko), a hefty amount of fake CGI action (despite being the most expensive movie at the time), an amnesiac Harry, and an emo Peter that was more cringeworthy than sinister. At least 2018's animated Spider-Verse got a good laugh out of this latter infamous meme.

Like Christopher Reeve and Joel Schumacher before him, Raimi has since apologized for this third outing, despite it making millions of dollars at the box-office. It would've been interesting to see his take on the Vulture and the Lizard in a now-cancelled fourth movie. Neverthless, it'll be mind-boggling to see what he does with his return to the Marvel universe next year with the Doctor Strange sequel. (9/7/2021) 

It's a curious thing that, five years after Sam Raimi left his Spider-Man franchise, Sony decided to reboot the series with a new cast--and familiar story beats that have now become tiring clichés and tropes.

That being said, I consider myself one of the few who actually liked 2012's The Amazing Spider-Man. I appreciated its more grounded, even grittier, approach, which was clearly inspired by the "Ultimate" versions from the comics (not to mention a capitalization on Christopher Nolan's Batman Begins). Its action sequences (while clearly CGI half the time) feel more visceral and immersive, even incorporating the wall-crawler's artificial webbing (absent from Raimi's original trilogy); the bridge rescue and crane sequences, for one, sure pack a real emotional punch. Its performances (particularly the genuine chemistry between Andrew Garfield's quippy and rebellious Peter Parker and Emma Stone's quirky and firm Gwen Stacy) are rich and engaging, its score (courtesy the late James Horner) is mysterious and wondrous, and its direction (courtesy [500] Days of Summer's Marc Webb, no pun intended) is slick and unique. It even features one of Stan Lee's greatest cameo appearances!

Still, only time will tell if this rendition will hold up. Less we forget, this represents part of an era where studios bought into the misconception that a "successful" comic book movie--and franchise--needed to be dark and gritty to rake in millions. My suggestion: wait a few extra years before you restart or continue a series instead of rushing (or, in this case, swinging) to the next installment. (More on that later.) And one more thing: try not to do the same thing(s) as before, especially if the audience already knows the main character's backstory. (9/12/2021) 

Andrew Garfield and Amy Adams did an "Actors on Actors" interview in 2016, where both discussed the difficulties of being a part of superhero franchises (Garfield with Spider-Man, Adams with the DC Extended Universe). One thing they agreed on was how the respective studios (Sony and Warner Bros) seemed to be more interested in quickly building on their own series rather than taking the time to tell effective stories.

Sony tried this when they quickly rebooted Spider-Man five years after Sam Raimi finished his trilogy that started in 2002. But it was clearly evident when they followed up the 2012 reboot The Amazing Spider-Man two years later, and attempted to build on the character's rogues gallery while giving more backstory on Peter Parker's parents in two-and-a-half hours (rather incoherently). Unfortunately, it suffers many of the same issues that 2007's Spider-Man 3 had, particularly with too many characters and one-dimensional (even goofy) dialogue; Jamie Foxx's one-note Electro (while visually dazzling) and Paul Giamati's hammy Rhino feel like the wrong characters in the wrong movie. If they would've focused solely on the relationships between Peter Parker and Gwen Stacy (Garfield and Emma Stone still deliver), Harry Osborn (the underrated Dean DeHaan), and Aunt May, it could've been a better film.

While not quite the absolute worst Spider-Man movie, there are a few elements that do stand out, like Hans Zimmer's cool score (including an awesome track over the end credits), Spidey's updated costume (echoing Bruce Wayne's Batsuit update from The Dark Knight), bold cinematography, and a powerful homage to "The Night Gwen Stacy Died" arc from the comics. As mentioned before, this short-lived interpretation represents Hollywood learning the hard way when it comes to building cinematic universes. Perhaps they should take a cue from Richard Parker's final recorded words in this film. (9/13/2021) 

After making his scene-stealing debut in Captain America: Civil War (2016), Tom Holland's energetic rendition of Peter Parker/Spider-Man gets his solo feature debut in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

The good news: this co-production between Sony and Marvel Studios is a fresh, fun-filled take that ignores the clichéd origin story tropes of the character (i.e., radioactive spider-bite, Uncle Ben dying), something that proved a disadvantage in Andrew Garfield's previous iteration. Instead, Homecoming gets right into action as Peter tries to prove he has what it takes to join the Avengers, even while balancing his high school life and social relationships. (Director Jon Watts reportedly had the cast watch several John Hughes films from the 1980s for inspiration. Plus, you'll never hear the Ramones' "Blitzkrieg Pop" the same way again.) Michael Keaton makes a great, exceptional adversary as the Vulture (honestly, what is it with Hollywood casting Keaton in bird-like roles?), and the costume and visual aesthetic is a great homage to the original comics from the 1960s.

The not-so-good news: some of its content gets surprisingly crass (no different than what Hughes' films contained, yet Sam Raimi's and Marc Webb's movies never went this far), which feels out-of-place; the same applied to its 2019 follow-up. Plus, this blockbuster hit stands more as part of a larger film universe than as a solo story--and there are quite a few webs to connect, in that regard. Still, it is nice to see a franchise not repeating itself for a change.

WRITER'S NOTE: Check out my full review from 2017. (9/20/2021) 

In the last two decades alone, Marvel Comics' Spider-Man has gone through three different live-action incarnations, almost half-a-dozen T.V. spinoffs, and even more than one major studio. You'd think by 2018 that, with the announcement of a new animated film from Sony, the general public had grown tired of such oversaturation and apparent unoriginality.

Well, imagine our surprise (and delight) when Into the Spider-Verse was released at the end of the year. Not only does it pull off the daunting task of incorporating various renditions of Stan Lee & Steve Ditko's ever-popular wallcrawler (from an older, pudgier Peter Parker; to a manga-inspired teenage girl; a hard-boiled detective; and even a talking pig). It does so in mind-boggling styling. Producers Phil Lord and Christopher Miller have stated they wanted the film to evoke the sense of walking into a living comic-book. And the tone and style (combining hand-drawn features in a bold, in-depth, and eye-popping CGI environment) is unlike anything ever put to celluloid, animated or live-action. Talk about out of this world! This is radical filmmaking and artistry of the highest order. (I saw it four times in theaters, and can honestly say that IMAX is the best format to experience it in.)

More importantly, the central story of biracial teenager Miles Morales (a fan favorite since his comic-book inception in 2011) gives the film its beating heart, showcasing an original, engrossing, and poignant arc--while hilariously satirizing the other backstories and tropes--of a young man thrown into sudden and extraordinary circumstances and coming into his own. In turn, he and the other "Spider-People" showcase that anybody (no matter what age, gender, race, or genre) can be a hero, and they're not the only ones. Sam Raimi may have made the best live-action Spidey film with his 2004 sequel, while Tom Holland may hold a current record for playing the character on screen the most times. But the communal, roller-coaster Spider-Verse leaves them all behind. Or should I say, webbed-up. (9/14/2021) 

Following the events of the crossover Avengers: Infinity War and even before the release of the record-breaking Avengers: Endgame, I (and I'm sure many others) wondered whether this 2019 Spidey follow-up (and the MCU's epilogue to their first three cinematic phases, now dubbed "The Infinity Saga") would take place before or after the former blockbuster. Like Endgame, I won't bother spoiling any major details or twists, except to say that the directions its globe-trotting story takes are quite surprising, mind-blowing, and genuine. (A few content issues, as with Homecoming, could've easily been avoided.) I will say, also, that Sony and Marvel have been taking full advantage of Peter Parker's rogues gallery so far (Jake Gyllenhaal's Mysterio is a knockout here). They've arguably made the some of the best teaser posters as well. The MCU will never be the same from here. "Be ready for anything." (9/28/2021)